I wonder is that court order of grant of stay of execution valid. The Star quoted that the Federal Court referred the case back to the High Court as it involves the State Constitution. Does that means the HIGH COURT is the HIGHEST RULING COURT for this case? Anyone agrees? It means that all appeals should be rejected.
Even the papers, National newspapers refer Zambry as MB and Nizar as ex-MB... You got brain or not? Illegitimate MB and legitimate MB are different you know? Opps... Maybe you people can't differentiate illegitimate and legitimate, lawful and unlawful, halal and haram. I feel sad for those journalists.
What the hell of Kangaroo Court is this??? Appeals and Federal court have no integrity compared to the High Court. I may be a noob in all these cases...
You know what??? Study form 6!!! Pengajian Am states that Court of Appeal cases must be decided by a panel of odd number judges. But in this case there was only a single judge. I wonder what are we learning in PA???
Just study to get an A? no!!! We must apply what we study. So, the judiciary peoples trying to fool school students by fielding a single judge for Court of Appeal cases??
MPM might as well drop the subject!!! Cakap tak serupa bikin and as for us students baca tak serupa benar.
No comments:
Post a Comment